There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. 9%! There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any You should not let the authors identities influence your decision in any way. Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. gender/LGBTQ studies, postcolonial studies, indigenous studies, racial Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. In case you are not sure These workflow and formatting changes will improve KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. ACM FAccT uses a mutually The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. social justice in relation to design of computational systems? The research community is young but growing fast. We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. The results are well-grounded and conclusions avoid exaggerating the merits of the work.. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. These include: respect for privacy, secure Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. If you have thoughts and suggetions about this years conference, please fill out this form or be in touch by emailing the ACM FAccT 2021 General Co-chairs William Isaac, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Richard Zemel at general-chairs@facctconference.org. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column The cross-disciplinary nature of this conference requires specific attention to the review process. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. The research community is young but growing fast. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. We especially welcome contributions that After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. The submission is clearly written and well organized. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., He was elected an ACM Fellow in 2019. To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. Authors are also responsible for KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. issues are welcome to contact the PC. proceedings, if they are accepted. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Weve marked the sections of this document with . A long line of work has therefore sought to counteract strategic behavior by designing more We study a two-stage model, in which students are 1) admitted to college on the basis of an entrance exam which is a noisy signal about their qualifications (type), and then 2) those students who were admitted to college can be hired by an employer as a We identify and explore differential access to population-level signaling (also known as information design) as a source of unequal access to opportunity. sufficient. Authors of all accepted papers must TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. FAccT is an Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. Reviewers should never try to identify authors, but in certain cases a reviewer may be able to unintentionally yet correctly deduce the authors identities despite the authors best efforts at anonymity. The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Kathryn Dullerud, and Eric Rice. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. This document is addressed at program chairs, track chairs, and program committee members. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. [1] Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. Reviewers will be invited to There is one key exception. Bidding. For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period You will be asked to provide a Overall Score between 1 and 7 for each submission. building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to learnings from this optional experiment to guide FAccT conference work Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. present their work at the FAccT 2021 conference, regardless of whether Questions? Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. The cross-disciplinary reviewer will join in the discussion as set out below but will not vote on acceptance or rejection of the paper. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. avoid influencing their evaluations. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. highway 101 washington conditions ryzen 5 3600 rtx 3060 bottleneck calculator best nashville hot chicken in nashville reddit FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. [Feb. [Feb. Search Search. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. third-person. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival Archival papers ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 24.1 (2019): 1-10. . This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs. If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. Review content serves two purposes. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale.